Victim Blaming vs. Personal Responsibility

via New York City Council Member Shuts Down Victim Blaming in Two Minutes Flat

I’ve been mulling over this issue in my mind.  I still believe there is a middle ground we’re not looking at here.

Yes, there is something very broken in our culture, when rape and assault is considered a valid choice by a portion of the population.  Whether it is valid due to a narcissistic view of the world (making the victim simply a 2-dimensional character in an individual’s worldview), or because the perpetrator feels there will be no repercussions doesn’t really matter.

But, women aren’t the only victims of rape, assault or any other form of aggression or criminality.

While I agree with the councilwoman when she says: “ Every woman in the city of New York should feel safe, whether they are coming home late at night, early in the morning, coming from a party, or going to work extremely late.”. But I expand the definition.  EVERY PERSON in our culture should be able to feel safe, regardless of gender or race or religious affiliation or lifestyle or sexual orientation.

The reality is, this is not going to happen in our current culture.  Too many people feel justified in acting against anyone else, doing whatever they please to another human being.  It’s not just criminals, though they are a large portion.  It’s the businessman who considers the income of the stockholders is of far more importance than the health or welfare of those who live within a reasonable area of his business.  It’s the average person who considers it justified to ignore when a service person gives them too much change (it may not seem like much to us, but the cashier often gets punished for it, because their drawer doesn’t balance at the end of the day – and if it is too much, they can lose their job over it).  It’s the professional who speeds down a street, ignoring the safety of pedestrians and other drivers, because they have somewhere important to be.  It’s ignoring the fact that our choices have an impact on others.

I believe firmly that there is never any excuse for rape.

But I also firmly believe that one must live with the world they HAVE, while fighting for the world they WANT TO HAVE.

ANYONE walking alone at night, drunk or in some other way considered vulnerable, is going to be prey for the predators out there.  Doesn’t matter what their gender is.  Is it any better that it is a man who gets violently assaulted, just because the woman got raped?  Both issues are a violation of someone’s body autonomy.  Is it worse that the police officer judges it is the man’s fault for being in that area, and not being strong enough to fight off his attacker?  Law enforcement does that too – not just with women.

How is it that adult bullies get away with their shit, because some law enforcement officer just tells them to “take it outside” – the other guy still gets beat the shit out of, just no damage to the location.

Do we need to fight against victim-blaming?  Of course we do!  But we need to make sure that while we fight it, we also realize that we cannot have two different standards for violence against people.  We cannot ignore personal responsibility in a situation.

If I’m raped, I am NOT going to attack anyone who is attempting to help stop it, or help me after the rape.  I’ve also learned my lesson about not reporting being sexually assaulted.  I’m not going to let someone get away with assaulting me – because that makes it easier for them to do it to someone else.  THAT is personal responsibility.

But if I see a man being kicked the shit out of, I’m ALSO going to not ignore the situation. He’s not any safer just because he’s a man. I may try to keep myself safe, but I’m not going to leave the guy to be killed.

And in the world we live in right now, if I have to walk alone at night, I’m going to make damned sure that I DO NOT look vulnerable or a victim.  I’m going to assess the danger around me with every step.  And while I rarely get drunk, I’m making damned sure I’m not alone when I am the least bit impaired.  I’m going to make sure I’m not ignoring the world around me by staring at my phone or tablet unless I’m in a larger group (and even then, I’m not going to put my attention 100% on my  phone or tablet).  I’m going to make sure if I’m listening to music, that I have one ear open to the sounds around me.  I’m going to be aware of the people around me, particularly making sure I can describe them if I need to.

Do I want a better world? YES.  Am I fighting for that better world? YES.

But  let’s not ignore that we have to live in the world we have while we build that better world.

Categories: Creativity, Gender Inequities, Mental Retraining | Tags: , , , , , | 3 Comments

Post navigation

3 thoughts on “Victim Blaming vs. Personal Responsibility

  1. “But I also firmly believe that one must live with the world they HAVE” – If you hold consent to be important, you wouldn’t agree with this. People have the right to leave this world behind. It’s not like anyone chose to be born.

    Other than that, I agree with you. My friend’s house is always unlocked and they never had a break-in. No one calls for the thief. A person who chooses to assault, to steal, to rape does so on their own. No one tempts them.

    • A straw man argument, really?

      Consent is not the argument here. If anything, it is an adjunct or tangent.

      Secondly, the decision to “leave the world” {which to me brings up two other issues – euthanasia and suicide, rather than what I would call terminal stupidity (i.e. doing something you know is an unnecessary and often fatal risk, regardless of consequences – essentially, the ‘Here, hold my beer’ jackass shit)}, is another side discussion.

      1. Euthanasia: You might be surprised to hear that I agree with a person in terminal illness having the choice not only to refuse “extraordinary measures” or “do not resusitate” orders, but also knowing that they will only deteriorate indefinitely being able to choose the time and manner of their own death. Personally, I know that if I ever get to that point, I don’t want to be a drain on what is already a strained financial position for my family. I refuse to put my family into further debt and strain, if I’m only going to die anyways. So, yes, I agree with “Assisted suicide.”
      2. Suicide: I’ll be quite frank that I am rather hard-hearted about suicide. One of the ways my ex controlled not only me but my co-wives as well, was by threatening suicide. There was only one so-called attempt during my time with him (in 2003, I believe), but if you have any medical awareness, you will realize that 6 sleeping pills and a bottle of hard cider would NOT cause death.

        By the end of my time with him, that threat often elicited the response of: ‘OK, just do it in the back yard so I don’t have to clean up the blood’, to his threats of taking the pistol out and shooting himself.

        Is that harsh? Yes, it is. But, sadly, the reality is most people who REALLY intend to kill themselves, as opposed to those who control or manipulate by threatening it, are going to do so with NO warning, with NO signs of the thought unless you are REALLY aware of their every move and choice. And they do it most often at the end of a LONG while of persecution, bullying and abuse (most of which is either well hidden behind “family” doors, or well hidden behind the population of the school they are in). These people have given up looking for help, and many have tried looking for help and been denied or betrayed by it.

        I have sympathy for the real suicides, not so much for those who threaten it as a way to control or manipulate others.

      3. Terminal Stupidity: This requires:
        1. Willful ignorance: – Ignoring or denying absolute truths because they don’t match the person’s subjective reality
        2. A complete lack of so-called Common Sense: Refusing to learn from previous mistakes, errors in judgement and failure to learn from others close enough to them for them to have seen the mistakes those others have made
        3. A complete lack of understanding of the law of Cause and Effect: If a, then b. It’s fairly simple. Put your hand in a fire, you end up with a burned hand. Duh!
      • Manipulative people and assholes aren’t a reason to withheld AS from anyone who wants it. No one can consent to living, so only AS allows us to actually consent to life. If people who ‘really wanted to die’ always did it, I wouldn’t have been here. It’s difficult to do. That’s why I advocate for AS available to anyone who wishes it, even if you’re rich as hell. Giving people an easy, painless way to die when the choose so is charity.

        But that’s a different topic. Since I have first-hand experience with it I’m fired by it like you are by sexism. It’s very close.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: